Ranjeet Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45459 of 2019 Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-99 Year-2019 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== Ranjeet Mandal, aged about 35 years, Male, Son of Hare Ram Mandal Resident of Village - Depoti Purandaha, P.S.- Dhamdaha, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Dhamdaha P.S.Case No.99 of 2019 registered for an offence under Sections 447, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that some of the accused persons including the petitioner came with variously armed and started assaulting the brother of the informant due to which the brother of the informant sustained head injury. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides received injuries. Petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45459 of 2019(3) dt.20-09-2019 2/2 05.04.2019 having clean antecedent.

In view of the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S.Case No.99 of 2019, with following condition:- (i) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T