← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54520/2021allowed

Rudal Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-05Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54520 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2021 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rudal Pandit Son Of Nagina Pandit Resident Of Village- Astipur Lalchak Ghasuspur, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District- Vaishali At Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner along with other co-accused persons are said to have tore the informant's saree in order to make her naked. On protest, all of them misbehaved with the informant. They also took out Rupees 5,000 from the pocket of the informant's devar.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54520 of 2021(4) dt.05-12-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Vaishali Sadar P.S. Case No. 200 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) guddukr/- U T