Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7798/2017rejected

Ankush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-01Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7798 of 2017 (4) dt.01-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7798 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2012 Thana -SIGORI District- PATNA ====================================================== Ankush Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sigori P.S. Case No. 57 of 2012, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, there is land dispute between the parties and on account of that scuffle took place between the parties and the father of the informant sustained injury. Altogether six persons have named in the F.I.R. and out of six, five accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by the lower court itself. Hence, the petitioner deserves the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7798 of 2017 (4) dt.01-09-2017 privilege of anticipatory bail.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the there is specific allegation of causing injury with Khanti on the head of father of the informant. Prosecution witnesses have also supported the prosecution version.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of this petitioner is, rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T