← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55096/2021bail granted

Gautam Kumar Singh@ Gautam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-13Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55096 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2020 Thana- SHYAMPUR BHATHA DistrictSheohar ====================================================== 1.

Gautam Kumar Singh@ Gautam Kumar S/O Abhay Kumar Singh R/O Village- Lalgarh P.S.- Shyampur Bhataha, District- Sheohar 2.

Saurav Kumar S/O Abhay Kumar Singh R/O Village- Lalgarh P.S.- Shyampur Bhataha, District- Sheohar 3.

Gaurav Kumar Singh @ Gaurav Kumar S/O Abhay Kumar Singh R/O Village- Lalgarh P.S.- Shyampur Bhataha, District- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Shyampur Bhatha P.S. Case no. 217 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 323, 341, 379, 448, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, several accused persons including the petitioners have assaulted the informant resulting into several injuries to him.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55096 of 2021(2) dt.13-04-2022 2/2 no offence. The occurrence took place at the spur of moment. General and omnibus allegations have been attributed against the petitioners. There is case and counter case. Both parties have sustained injury. Injury report shows that injuries were caused by hard and blunt substance but doctor has reserved the opinion. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Shyampur Bhataha P.S. Case no. 217 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM 1st, Sheohar subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U