Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56039 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2020 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son Of Vijay Kumar Resident Of Village- Mainamath, P.S.- Ghosi (OKARI), District- Jehanabad, At Present-F-212 Lado Sarai, New Delhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jogendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 323, 326, 307, 504 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and in the light of the said statement
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56039 of 2021(3) dt.13-10-2022 2/2 made by the victim, no case is made out against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is also involved in the present case and this fact supported the prosecution case in the case diary. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that petitioner is involved in the present case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 441 of 2020. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T