Laila Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44385 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2025 Thana- BITHAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Laila Khatoon W/o Mohammad Naushad R/o Village - Tekbajpur, P.S. - Bithan, Distt. - Samastipur.

2.

Rubi Khatoon W/o Mehadi Hasan R/o Village - Tekbajpur, P.S. - Bithan, Distt. - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kundan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 329(4), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are women and the informant alleges that on 09.08.2025 at 11:00 AM Md. Naushad damaged his bamboo screen (tat) by tractor and threatened to demolish his hut, on objection, Md. Naushad assaulted him by farsa causing injury on head and also assaulted his sister by farsa causing injury on head, further also assaulted his father causing injury on hand, while Md. Faijul assaulted his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44385 of 2026(2) dt.21-07-2026 2/2 mother by rod causing injury on head, it is next alleged that occurrence occurred on account of dispute relating to land.

4. Learned counsel for the the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being related to family members of Md. Naushad, it is further submitted that no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioners and petitioners are women. 5 Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bithan P.S. Case No. 87 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7. This application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) nitesh/- U T