← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16524/2021dismissed

Din Bandhu Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-07Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16524 of 2021 ====================================================== Din Bandhu Pandey Son of Late Vidya Pandey, Resident of Village-Chhota Preua, Near Panitanki, Ward No. 18, Raxaul, P.S.-Raxaul, District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Dept., Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Deputy Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Dept., Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 4.

The Additional Collector (Revenue), East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sikrahna (Dhaka) East Champaran, Motihari. 6.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Sikrahna (Dhaka) East Champaran, Motihari.

7.

That Circle Officer, Ghorasahan, East Champaran, Motihari. 8.

Bettiah Estate through its Manager, Bettiah, West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhurendra Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 07-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of appropriate writ/s, order/s or direction, directing upon respondents concerned to enquire into the matter and take legal action against those erring persons in whose connivance raiyati certificate was issued of Bakast land of Bettiah Estate by the then circle favour officer, Ghorasahan of one Gorakh Sah appertaining to

Patna High Court CWJC No.16524 of 2021(2) dt.07-02-2024 2/2 Khata No. 2, Kheshra No. 176, situated in village Bhagwanpur Kotwa, Thana No.7, Anchal Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran. "

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondents authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U