Francis Samuel v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10660 of 2025 ====================================================== Francis Samuel Son of Late Daniel Samuel Resident of Mohalla- Christian Colony, Gaya, Police Station- Rampur in the district of Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5.
The District Education Officer, Gaya.
6.
The District Programme Officer (Estb.), Gaya. 7.
The Block Education Officer, Gurua in the district of Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Ajay Behari Singh, GA(8) Mr. Neeraj Raj, AC to GA 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Behari Singh, learned GA(8), along with Mr. Neeraj Raj, learned AC to GA(8) for the State.
2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought inter alia the following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:- "I. To direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for his transfer as per Rule 3 read with Rule 5(Kha) of Bihar Nationalized Elementary Teacher Transfer (Disciplinary action and promotion) Rule, 2018 (hereinafter referred in short Rule, 2018) as per the option of transfer granted to the teachers.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10660 of 2025(2) dt.07-07-2025 2/2 II. Also to direct the respondents to transfer the petitioner as per his option given by him in pursuance to Rule-3 read with Rule 5(Kha) of the Rule, 2018.
III. Also for any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the eye of law."
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner informs that the petitioner has already filed an application before the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Gaya for considering his case, based on the recommendation made by the Block Education Officer, as contained in letter no.140 dated 27.03.2025 (Annexure-4), however, the same is pending till date.
4. Considering the above information the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Gaya is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, expeditiously, in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U