Ashok Singh And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13502 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2012 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Ashok Singh, son of Bhup Narayan Singh
2. Ajay Kumar Singh @ Raj Kapoor
3. Amit Kumar Singh @ Amit Kumar
4. Arjun Kumar Singh @ Sambhu Kumar Petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 are sons of Ashok Singh. All are resident of village Kachauth, P.S. Salukha, Distt. Saharsa.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Most. Banti Devi @ Swati, wife of late Bablu Singh @ Ajit, resident of village Kachauth, P.S. Salkhua, Distt. Saharsa. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Saharsa Mahila P.S. Case No. 21 of 2012 instituted for the offence under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
It has been submitted that petitioner No. 1 is father-inlaw and petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 are Dewar of the complainant. They have no concern with the affairs of wife and husband. From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13502 of 2017 (4) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Saharsa Mahila P.S. Case No. 21 of 2012, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.