← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6352/2015dismissed

Sudhakar Prasad And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-06Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6352 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Sudhakar Prasad son of Late Kashi Lal

2. Saurabh Kumar son of Mithilesh Kumar

3. Binod Sao son of Chandeshwar Sao

4. Arbind Kumar son of Arjun Pandit

5. Anup Pandit son of Late Lakhan Pandit

6. Bhola Pandit son of Late Girdhari Pandit

7. Birendra Prasad son of Ishwar Prasad

8. Subodh Kumar son of Basudev Prasad

9. Rakesh Kumar son of Late Bhola Bishwakaram

10. Rajiv Kumar son of Sudhir Pandit

11. Ashwani Kumar son of Late Niranjan Pd. Singh

12. Raju Singh son of Mahesh Pd. Singh

13. Rintu Kumar @ Rintu Singh son of Mahesh Singh

14. Kanchan Kumar son of Vyas Prasad

15. Virendra Gupta son of Late Bandho Sao

16. Ram Lakhan Prasad son of Sri Chandrika Prasad All are residents of village - Takua Tar (Rajauli) Post + P.S. - Rajauli, District - Nawada.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, P.W.D. Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate Nawada.

3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajauli, Nawada.

4. Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Rajauli, District - Nawada.

5. The Circle Officer Rajauli, District - Nawada.

6. The Chairman Zila Parishad, Nawada.

7. Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Nawada.

8. District Engineer, Zila Parishad, Nawada.

.... .... Respondents ======================================================

Patna High Court CWJC No.6352 of 2015 (2) dt.03-08-2018 2/2 Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dronacharya, Advocate : Mr. Arghesh Kumar, Advocate For State : Mr. Ajay- GA-12 For other respondents :

Mr. Nikesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-08-2018 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that due to efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous.

In view of the submission made above, it is dismissed as infructuous.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/SkSuman.

U