Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41488 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2019 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

MANISH KUMAR, son of Lakki Yadav, 2.

Mahendra Kumar Yadav, son of Ajeet Yadav, both Resident of Naya Tola, Rohtara, P.S- Rohtara, District- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 17-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners seek bail in Jandaha P.S. Case No.34 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 392, 411, 414 Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XI, Vaishali at Hajipur. It is alleged that on the date of occurrence two persons had overtaken motorcycle of the informant and snatched bag containing Rs.3,61,000/- from the informant, which he had withdrawn from the bank. The informant raised halla and both miscreants were arrested. They disclosed their names as petitioners.

Seizure list is available with the First Information

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41488 of 2019(3) dt.17-08-2019 2/2 Report from which it appears that bag containing Rs.3,61,000/- was recovered from possession of petitioner No.2, while petitioner No.1 was driving the motorcycle.

It further appears from para 3 of the bail application that petitioners have criminal antecedents.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

Prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail is rejected at this stage.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make all efforts to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Liberty is given to the petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after six months, if no substantive progress is made in the trial.

(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T