← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2196/2016disposed

Suba Prasad Sharma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-02Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2196 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Suba Prasad Sharma Son of Late Kamala Prasad Sharma, Resident of Village and Post - Mahajpura, Police Station - Bikram, District - Patna.

2. Ramanuj Sharma, Son of Late Ram Prakas Sharma, Resident of Bikram, Near Tribhuvan Library, P.O. and P.S. Bikram, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Patna.

5. The District Education Officer, Patna.

6. The Deputy Development Commissioner - cum - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Patna.

7. The Principal, Parvati Higher Secondary School, Bikram, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raghwanand, G.A-IX Mr. Rajan, AC to GA-XI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 02-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents.

The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ application is non-payment of remuneration for the period the petitioners were engaged by the respondent to act as Assistant Teachers on contractual basis in Parvati Higher Secondary School, Bikram after superannuation.

He submits that the petitioners have rendered service pursuant to the Annexure-1 series and as such respondents are

Patna High Court CWJC No.2196 of 2016(2) dt.02-02-2018 2/2 obliged to make payment for the period the petitioners have rendered service.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.5 who shall see that the petitioners are paid remuneration for the period the petitioners have worked as contractual Assistant Teachers. The decision in this regard, must be taken by the respondent nos. 4 and 5 within a period eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U