Patna High CourtCWJC/9383/2015dismissed

Manish Bharti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9383 of 2015 =========================================================== Manish Bharti, Son of Ram Bilash Mandal, resident of Kasimpur, P.S. - Goradih, District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The District Magistrate Bhagalpur.

3. The District Supply Officer, Bhagalpur.

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer Sadar Bhagalpur.

5. The Block Supply Officer Gordih, District- Bhagalpur.

6. The Block Development Officer Goradih, District- Bhagalpur.

7. Minhajul Haque @ Minhajul Islam Son of Late Samshul Haque, resident of Village- Kasimpur, P.S.- Goradih, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Kumar - SC11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-08-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents concerned to enquire into the matter of granting licence under public distribution system vide Licence No. 01/2015 in favour of respondent no. 7 on compassionate ground and after enquiry cancel the PDS licence of the respondent no. 7 inasmuch as he has obtained the licence by playing fraud and misrepresentation of fact.

2. A bare perusal of paragraph 7 of the writ petition discloses that the petitioner is raising a bogey of fraud on the part of the respondent no. 7 on the ground that there appears to be fraud in the date of birth of the father of respondent no.7.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9383 of 2015 dt.14-08-2018 2/2

3. This Court is unable to appreciate how a doubt in respect of date of birth of the father of respondent no. 7 can constitute fraud played by respondent no. 7. No fruitful purpose will be served by directing the respondents for disposal of the representation of the petitioner.

4. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 05.09.2018 Transmission Date N.A.