← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55463/2021bail granted

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-20Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55463 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2021 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR Son of Vinod Mahto Resident of Village - Chakmehsi, P.S.- Chakmehsi, Distt.- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-05-2022 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Musrigharari Police Station Case No. 38 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 382/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that the informant was accosted by three unknown miscreants, riding on a motorcycle and they looted away Rs. 1,11,900/-, mobile phone etc and the looted mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of the fact that the looted mobile phone was recovered from his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55463 of 2021(2) dt.20-05-2022 2/2 possession. He next submits that the petitioner had purchased the mobile phone from his co-villager Md. Maksood @ Aftab without knowing the fact that the mobile was a looted article. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 1306.2021 and charge sheet has already been submitted against him and as such there is no likelihood that the petitioner will abscond and/or tamper with the evidence.

Regards being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record and the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since 1306.2021, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Samastipur, in connection with Musrigharari Police Station Case No. 38 of 2021.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √