Arvind Sharma And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27844 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2017 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Arvind Sharma

2. Anil Sharma, Both sons of Subhash Sharma, Both resident of VillageSenwariya, P.S.- Sirisiya, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Uma Chaudhary, S/o Shiv Pujan Chaudhary, R/o Badidori, Ausani, Bagaha, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Randhir Kumar No-1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Tr. No.1533 of 2017 arising out of Complaint Case No.16 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and406 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that he acquainted with the O.P.No.2 and he assured to send some person foreign for job and in view of that he has taken Rs.35,000/- from them and thereafter they have taken Rs.75,000/- from them. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the alleged amounting to Rs.35,000/- was deposited in the account

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27844 of 2018 (3) dt.05-07-2018 2/2 of B.C. Sharma and not in the account of the petitoner and there is no chit of paper to show that he has given Rs.75,000/- for each candidate.

Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that the petitioner has asked to deposit amount in the account and he has given account number and he has deposited the amount in that account and he has also given Rs.75,000/- for each candidate for sending foreign for job and the papers given by the petitioner i.e. visa and other papers were found forged..

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and make prayer for regular bail. With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T