Yogen Sah @ Nogen Sah @ Nagendra Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14850 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -473 Year- 2016 Thana -KISHANGANJ District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Yogen Sah @ Nogen Sah @ Nagendra Sah, son of Satya Narayan Sah, resident of Dharamganj, Ward No. 11, Police Station- Kishanganj, DistrictKishanganj. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Rahmatullah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kishanganj P.S.Case No. 473 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that impugned order itself shows that there is nothing available on the record to show involvement of the petitioner but prayer for anticipatory bail has been rejected by learned Sessions Judge on the ground that this case is at the initial stage. Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts stated above, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14850 of 2017 (2) dt.04-04-2017 2/2 surrender in the court within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 473 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further conditions that petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available before the police as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates, the prosecution shall be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds and further petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U