Santosh Singh @ Santosh Prasad Singh And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26690 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -355 Year- 2017 Thana -RAJAULI District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. SANTOSH SINGH @ SANTOSH PRASAD SINGH Son of Ram Pravesh Singh.
2. Sanjeev Prasad Singh @ Sanjeev Singh Son of Ram Pravesh Singh. All Both Are Resident of Village-Karigaon, P.S.-Rajauli, District-Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 355 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation as per F.I.R is that petitioner no. 2 took away the husband of the informant and in the midnight, it was informed to the informant that her husband has become unconscious, thereafter, the informant along with her father-in-law rushed to the place of occurrence, where she found that the blood was oozing out from the mouth of the husband of the informant and was dead. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have no role to play in the death of the deceased and have
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26690 of 2018 (3) dt.18-06-2018 2/3 falsely been made accused in this case and further no external injury has been found on the person of the deceased and his cause of death could also not be ascertained. Further other co-accused having similar allegation has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.03.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5516 of 2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 355 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26690 of 2018 (3) dt.18-06-2018 3/3 (ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T