Patna High CourtCWJC/2787/2013disposed

Nazhat Parven v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-16Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2787 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Nazhat Perven Daughter of Md. Aslam and Wife of Md. Ekramulla Haque Permanent Resident of Village- Salha, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan (East), District- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Samastipur

3. The Chairman, District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Samastipur

4. Block Development Officer, Sarairanjan East Block, District- Samastipur

5. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Salha, P.S. - Sarairanjan (East), DistrictSamastipur

6. The Block Education Officer, Sarairanjan, East Block, DistrictSamastipur

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Village- Salha, P.S.- Sarairanjan (East), District- Samastipur

8. Nigar Afza, wife of Md. Ezaz, resident of village- Salha, P.O. Barbatta, P.S. Sarairanjan, District-Samastipur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mauli Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr No.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2017 Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel informs that he has already appeared on behalf of Respondent no.8. Accordingly, there is no need to pass any order for issuance of notice. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of private Respondent have agreed that now the State Teachers Appellate Tribunal has already started functioning. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.2787 of 2013 (8) dt.16-01-2017 2/2 makes a prayer for disposal of the present writ petition, so that the petitioner may approach the State Teachers Appellate Tribunal. The prayer is allowed.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

It goes without saying that the period consumed in pursuing the present matter i.e. from 06.02.2013 till date shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U