Suraj Kuamr Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49668 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Suraj Kuamr Sah son of Dileep Pd. Sah @ Dileep Prasad Sah Resident of Village- Dulalganj ward no 09 PS- Amour District -Purnea 2.

Santosh Kumar Sah son of Dileep Pd. Sah @ Dileep Prasad Sah Resident of Village- Dulalganj ward no 09 PS- Amour District -Purnea 3.

Dileep Pd. Sah @ Dileep Prasad Sah Son of Late Rajendra Pd. Sah @ Late Rajendra Prasad Sah Resident of Village- Dulalganj ward no 09 PS- Amour District -Purnea 4.

Kajal Devi Wife of Santosh Kuamr Sah Resident of Village- Dulalganj ward no 09 PS- Amour District -Purnea 5.

Geeta Devi wife of Dileep Pd. Sah @ Dileep Prasad Sah Resident of Village- Dulalganj ward no 09 PS- Amour District -Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Md. Fazle Karim, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP For the Informant :

Md. Hussain, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49668 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 alleged have assaulted informant, her daughter and son.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Doctor has found the injuries, sustained by the injured, simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they assaulted informant and her children.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 81 of 2025, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49668 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T