Patna High CourtCWJC/8059/2016disposed

Suman Kumar Thakur And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-31Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8059 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Suman Kumar Thakur

2. Bhuwan Kumar Thakur

3. Gopal Kumar Thakur

4. Mahanand Kumar Thakur all are sons of Late Sadanand Thakur

5. Most Laxmi Devi Wife of Late Sadanand Thakur All are residents of Village- Sahuriya Tola, Tarha, P.S.- Banma Itahari, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Saharsa.

3. Additional Collector, Saharsa.

4. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Simari Bakhtiyarpur, District Saharsa.

5. Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Simari Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa.

6. Anchal Adhikari, Banma Itahari, District- Saharsa.

7. Jhati Sada, Son of Late Jagdeo Sada

8. Prithibi Sada

9. Brahmdeo Sada

10. Pranesh Sada Respondent Nos.8 to 10 are the sons of Late Hakko Sada

11. Most Chhathiya Devi Wife of Late Hakko Sada Respondent Nos. 7 to11 are resident of Village- Sahuriya Tola, Tarha, P.S.- Banma Itahari, DistrictSaharsa. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Purnendu Singh- Gp27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2018 Heard both sides.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondent no. 2, the District Magistrate, Saharsa to dispose of Bandobasti Appeal No. 10 of 2013 which have been filed by the petitioners for cancellation of settlement made by DCLR Saharsa in favour of private respondent.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8059 of 2016 (2) dt.31-07-2018 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the State has filed counter affidavit but did not state about the disposal of Bandobasti Appeal No. 10 of 2013 pending before the Collector.

Having considered the submission of both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Collector, Saharsa, respondent no. 2, to dispose of Bandobasti Appeal No. 10 of 2013 after hearing both sides within four months from the date of receipt of this order.

With this observation, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U