← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45541/2022allowed

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-13Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45541 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1013 Year-2021 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Ranjan Kumar Sonof Himanshu Rai Resident Of Village - Chhitnawan, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna.

2.

Lalan Kumar @ Lalan Rai Son Of Pramdhar Rai Resident Of Village - Chhitnawan, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamlesh Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Maner P.S. Case no. 1013 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner and other co-accused persons started firing bullets incessantly on informant and his brother due to which they sustained injury. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. There is a dispute raised between the parties on account of Mukhiya election due to which they have falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45541 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that petitioner no.1 was order giver in this case. There is case and counter case, both parties sustained injuries as alleged in separate occurrences. The injuries sustained by injured persons are simple in nature.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Maner P.S. Case no. 1013 of 2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Danapur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T