Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8387 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -229 Year- 2016 Thana -DANAPUR District- - ====================================================== Ajay Kumar S/o Late Shiv Kumar R/o Village - Sultanpur, P.S. Danapur, District : Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 229 of 2016 registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the N.I. Act pending in the Court of A.C.J.M, Danapur. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The fact is that the informant has misused the blank cheque given by the petitioner as a security amount. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that paragraph nos. 5,6,7,8,23,27 and 29 of the case diary prima facie corroborates the allegation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8387 of 2017 (3) dt.20-04-2017 2/2 leveled against the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the State, I do not feel inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is, therefore, rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Prakash/- U T