Patna High CourtMJC/3192/2016disposed

Sri Ram Lakhan Rai Sanskrit Prathamik Sah Madhyamik Vidyalaya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-25Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3192 of 2016 ====================================================== Sri Ram Lakhan Rai Sanskrit Prathamik Sah Madhyamik Vidyalaya Dipau, P.S. - Kotwa, district - East Champaran through its Head Master Rajendra Prasad Yadav, son of Shri Ram Lakhan Rai, resident of village Dipau, Post - Talwa Pokhar, P.S. - Kotwa, District - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Dr. Dharmendra Singh Gangwar, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Prakash Chandra Mishra, the Special Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Anupam Kumar, the District Magistrate, East Champaran.

4. Mr. Sahajanand Kumar, the District Education Officer, East Champaran.

5. Mr. Prakash Chandra Mishra, the Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

6. Mr. Milind Kumar Sinha, the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna through its Secretary, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the BSSB :

Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Vijay Kr. Verma, A.C. to G.A.2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2.

25-08-2018 In view of the decision of the Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna available at Annexure-3 to the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner, in the opinion of this court, the order passed by the learned writ court stands complied with.

This contempt application therefore cannot proceed and is dismissed accordingly.

Patna High Court MJC No.3192 of 2016 (2) dt.25-08-2018 In case, the petitioner is still aggrieved by Annexure-3 he will be at liberty to seek his remedy in accordance with law.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U