Raman Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47858 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2020 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Raman Rai Son of Late Rajendra Rai R/o Vill.- Karanpur North, P.o. and P.s.- Bochahan, Dist.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 75 of 2020 dated 07.03.2020 registered for the offences punishable u/s 307/34, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons along with 6-7 unknown persons came at the door of the informant. They started abusing the informant and his family members. On being objected, the co-accused Ravindra Rai ordered to kill then the petitioner and the coaccused persons started assaulting the informant's husband indiscriminately with iron rod due to which he sustained head
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47858 of 2024(2) dt.25-07-2024 2/3 injuries and Ravindra Rai smashed severely the head of the informant's husband with bricks. Thereafter, the informant's husband was brought to the hospital for treatment and during the course of treatment he died
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is full brother of the deceased and there was a land disputed between the both parties. The charge sheet has already been submitted u/s 302, 307, 504, 506/34 of the I.P.C. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2022.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Muzaffarupur, in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 75 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47858 of 2024(2) dt.25-07-2024 3/3 2020, with a condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T