Patna High CourtCWJC/19778/2016disposed

Kapildeo Prasad Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-06Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19778 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Kapildeo Prasad Singh Son of Sri Kripal Singh Resident of Village and P.O. Manjhaul, P.S. Manjhaul, District-Begusarai

2. Pramod Kumar No.-1 Son of Late Singheshwar Prasad Resident of Village-Mohalla-Brahmpura, P.S. Brahmpura, District-Muzaffarpur

3. Vijay Kumar Srivastava Son of Bhagwan Prasad Resident of MohallaMithanpura, P.O.Ramna, P.S. Mithanpura, District-Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. The Regional Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur.

6. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Mechanical Circle, Muzaffarpur.

7. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Mechanical Division, Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Giri- GP9 Mr. Manish Kumar, GP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fact of the present case is identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No.15263 of 2013 (Keshri Nandan Dwivedi Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) and its analogues cases, the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue

Patna High Court CWJC No.19778 of 2016 (2) dt.06-09-2018 2 /2 involved in the present case.

In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the case of petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations and directions this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny U