Kaleshwar Yadav And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16362 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Kaleshwar Yadav, s/o late Huro Yadav

2. Sudamiya Devi, w/o Kamleshwar Yadav

3. Sangita Devi, w/o Umesh Yadav All are residents of vill-Chandra (Katiyari), PS- Sono, Dist- Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State of Bihar

2. Fulwa Devi, w/o Umesh yadav, r/o vill- Chandra (Katiyari), PS- Sono, Dist- Jamui .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

The petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in connection with Mahila (Jamui) PS case no. 01 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 498A, 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that they are father-in-law, mother-in-law and second wife of informant. It is further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners and no specific overt act has been alleged against any of the petitioner.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16362 of 2017 (2) dt.08-04-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides. Considering the fact that there is no specific allegation against any of the petitioner, the anticipatory bail application of petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest/ surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Mahila (Jamui) PS case no. 01 of 2017 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a condition that bailors should be the local one having sufficient property within the jurisdiction of learned court below and with further condition that petitioners will cooperate and assist in the investigation of the case and if they fails to assist the investigating officer, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T