← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48293/2024bail granted

Chandreshwar Chaudhary @ Chandreshwar Choudhary @ Chandra Shekhar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-07Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48293 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2024 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== CHANDRESHWAR CHAUDHARY @ CHANDRESHWAR CHOUDHARY @ CHANDRA SHEKHAR CHOUDHARY, SON OF PARSURAM CHAUDHARY @ PARSHURAM CHAUDHARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MALAHCHAKIYA, POLICE STATION- BUXAR (MUFFASIL), DISTRICT - BUXAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Rai Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Buxar (Town) P.S. Case no. 213 of 2024 registered under sections 341, 323, 504 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the petitioner came to the Sadar Hospital where the informant is posted as Deputy Superintendent and entered into an altercation with the informant over issuance of O.P.D. emergency slip without getting any patient. It is stated that the petitioner abused and assaulted the informant and tried to take away the register.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48293 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The allegations as levelled in the FIR, besides being false and concocted, are a figment of imagination of the informant. The differences arose out of a trivial dispute when O.P.D. emergency slip was not being issued by the informant. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R. together with the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Buxar (Town) P.S. Case no. 213 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar. (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T