← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45281/2022allowed

Bishundeo Singh @ Animesh Kumar Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-01Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45281 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2022 Thana- TARAPUR District- Munger ====================================================== BISHUNDEO SINGH @ ANIMESH KUMAR BHARTI Son of Late Ashopal Singh Resident of village - Launa, P.S. Tarapur, Distt.- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jyoti Ranjan Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 341, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and 27 of Arms Act.

Allegedly, Abhimanyu Singh and his wife came out of the house and started quarreling with Rakesh Kumar Singh. Abhimanyu Singh fired at Rakesh Kumar Singh. Rakesh Kumar Singh received gun shot injuries in his hand. Informant also received gun shot injury near his shoulder.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45281 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 2/2 politics. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence in any manner, as he was not present at the place of occurrence. The petitioner is not named in the FIR but during the course of investigation, the name of the petitioner transpired in this case. Though the informant got injured but there is no injury report of the informant on record. It is clear from the impugned order itself. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is not injury report of informant on record, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Tarapur P.S. Case No.18 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.