Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18364/2017disposed

Naushad v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18364 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2016 Thana -SUKHANI District- KISANGANJ ======================================================

1. Naushad, Son of Bakkar @ Abubaker @ Abubaker Sidik, Resident of Village- Gillabari (Gilhabari), P.S. Jiapokher, District- Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarangdhar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sukhani P.S. Case No. 16 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 414 of Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended person and except that there is nothing against the petitioner so as to connect him with the present case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and nothing has been recovered either from his conscious possession or from his house and further the persons, who were apprehended on the spot has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 18.04.2017, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2778 of 2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18364 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner, privilege of anticipatory bail rater petitioner should surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below after considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner shall pass an appropriate order, if possible on the same day, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T