← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8577/2000dismissed

Ram Chandra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8577 of 2000 ====================================================== Ram Chandra Mahto, Son of Late Dukhan Mahto, Resident of Village Harigawn (Tola Dulhinganj), P.S. Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Deputy Director of Consolidation (Rohtas) Headquarter-Patna.

3. The Assistant Director of Consolidation, Bhojpur at Ara.

4. The Consolidation Officer, Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur.

5. Birendra Mahto @ Birendra Singh, Son of Ram Pravesh Singh, Resident of Village Deoghar (Tulasi Tola), P.S. Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur.

6. Ram Barai Mahto, Son of Late Maduan Mahto.

7. Subhash Mahto, Son of Late Maduan Mahto Respondent Nos.6 and 7, Residents of Village Dulhinganj, P.S. Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur.

8. Fulpati Devi, Wife of Vindhyachal Mahto, D/o Late Masudan Mahto

9. Panpati Devi, Wife of Himachal Mahto, D/o Late Masudan Mahto. Respondent Nos.8 and 9, Residents of Village Narbirpur, P.S. Koilwar, District Bhojpur.

10. Chanpati Devi, Wife of Anant Singh, D/o Late Masudan Mahto, Resident of Village Kulhariya, P.S. Koilwar, District Bhojpur.

11. Brij Bihari Singh, Son of Late Laldhari Singh.

12. Baban Singh, Son of Late Laldhari Singh.

Residents of Village Dulhinganj, P.S. Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur.

13. Most. Hiramani Devi, Wife of Late Hira Lal Singh, Resident of Village Baswana, P.S. Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur.

14. Raj Kumari Devi, Wife of Indradeo Singh, Resident of Village Janakpuri, P.S. Tarari, District Bhojpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hari Shankar Roy For the Respondent/s :

Mr. (Gp7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA

Patna High Court CWJC No.8577 of 2000(9) dt.28-08-2018 2/2 ORAL ORDER 28-08-2018 Vide order dated 19.05.2015, two weeks' time was allowed to file substitution petition of sole petitioner who died during the pendency of the suit but even after lapse of more than three years, no petition substituting petitioner is filed. In this view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) S.KUMAR/- U