Mir Kitanain @ Mir Kaitanain v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45610 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2015 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Mir Kitanain @ Mir Kaitanain Son of Ali Hasan Resident of village - Mir Toli, Sugauli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 2.
Mir Chhunu Son of Mir Atimullah Resident of village - Mir Toli, Sugauli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 3.
Mir Ajaz Son of Mir Narul Resident of village - Mir Toli, Sugauli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 4.
Mir Faiyaz Son of Mir Narul Resident of village - Mir Toli, Sugauli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 5.
Mir Mustafar Son of Mir Atimullah Resident of village - Mir Toli, Sugauli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 6.
Rukshana Khatun Wife of Mir Mansur Resident of village - Mir Toli, Sugauli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 7.
Mir Firoj Son of Mir Husnain Resident of village - Mir Toli, Sugauli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 8.
Mir Husnain Son of Mir Ali Hasan Resident of village - Mir Toli, Sugauli, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kundan Rathore Alias Kundan Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 448, 323, 324, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45610 of 2025(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 that from bare perusal of the impugned order it is apparent that petitioners have been declared absconders and process of Sections 82/83 of the Cr.P.C. has been initiated against them to ensure their appearance in the Court as such petitioners are not entitled to the relief of anticipatory bail (Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2012) 8 SCC 730, State of MP v. Pradeep Sharma (2014) 2 SCC 17, Prem Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar 2021 SCC OnLine SC 955).
4. Considering the aforesaid development, petition for pre-arrest bail of petitioners is dismissed as not maintainable. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T