Harishankar Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55660 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2019 Thana- PURAINI District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

HARISHANKAR RAJAK S/O BANARSI RAJAK R/O VILLAGEDIGHON, P.S. BELDAUR, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA 2.

BANARSI RAJAK S/O LATE SHANICHAR RAJAK @ LATE SUNDER RAJAK R/O VILLAGE- DIGHON, P.S. BELDAUR, DISTRICTKHAGARIA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nafisuzzoha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and u/s 27 of Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case,these petitioners along with other accused persons conspired and killed the brother of informant and took away Rani Devi with them. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. It is submitted that police after investigation found the case false against these petitioners but differing with the same

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55660 of 2021(2) dt.28-06-2022 2/2 the court below took cognizance against the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that petitioners are named in the FIR and there is specific allegation against them that they along with other accused persons conspired and killed the brother of informant and took away Rani Devi with them. During the course of investigation ample material has been collected against these petitioners to show their involvement in the aforesaid crime.

Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T