Sanjay Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44323 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Sanjay Paswan S/O Jayram Paswan R/O Village- Tetrawan, P.S.- Manpur, Distt.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aditya Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109, 117(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 17.02.2026 at 07:30 PM, the daughter of the petitioner was going to home carrying wood having thorn by which the informant got hurt on his face hence ask the daughter of the petitioner to move carefully, thereafter it is alleged that the accused persons along with the petitioner and female members of the family came and assaulted her by lathi and danda and also assaulted Arun and Tarun causing injury on their head and Tarun also suffered fracture of hand.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44323 of 2026(2) dt.20-07-2026 2/2 account of a trivial dispute as alleged in the FIR, it is further submitted that no doubt Tarun suffered grievous injury, but then the injury is not on vital part of the body, it is also submitted that the allegation of assault is also not specific, it is next submitted that petitioner is not a criminal and if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 36 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T