← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55530/2021rejected

Munilal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-08Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55530 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-274 Year-2021 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== MUNILAL PRASAD S/o SURESH PRASAD @ SURUJ MAHTO R/o VILLAGE-LAU KHAN (KANATIA), P.S-GHORASAHAN, DISTRICTEAST CHAMPARAN, MOTHIHARI, AT PRESENT-P.S-KUNDWA CHAINPUR, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bishweshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2022 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Ghorasahan P.S. Case No.274 of 2021 registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not arrested on the spot and nothing was recovered from his possession. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail by contending that total 24.200 litres of Nepali liquor was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55530 of 2021(2) dt.08-04-2022 2/2 recovered from the house of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T