Guru Rai @ Guru Ray @ Guddu Kumar Rai @ Guru Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46855 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2013 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== Guru Rai @ Guru Ray @ Guddu Kumar Rai @ Guru Kumar Ray, Male, Aged About 44 Years, Son of Yodha Ray @ Ram Ayodhya Ray, Resident of VillageChitarsenpur, P.S.- Sonpur, District- Saran at Chapra (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 62 of 2013 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner along with other accused persons, was allegedly involved in theft of three motorcycles.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, at the outset, informs this Court that FIR is of year 2013 and petitioner had earlier moved before this Court for grant of anticipatory bail, which was rejected vide order dated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46855 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/2 29.04.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6529 of 2014 and, thereafter, there was no question of being apprehended. The seizure list reveals that petitioner was involved in theft of three motorcycles in respect of which three seizure lists were prepared on 04.08.2013 and due to confusion in the name of the petitioner, he anticipated that he will be apprehended, as such, he has again filed the present anticipatory bail application.

5. After some arguments, learned counsel, upon instruction, seeks to withdraw the present bail application considering the fact that the other similarly situated accused person has been released on regular bail vide order dated 22.01.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51995 of 2013.

6. In such circumstances, the petitioner, if so advised, may surrender before the learned District Court and seek regular bail. In that case, the learned District Court is directed to adjudicate into the matter and pass a reasoned order same day, in accordance with law.

7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T