← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17668/2016disposed

Arbind Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-03Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17668 of 2016 ====================================================== Arbind Kumar Singh Son of Shiv Balak Singh, Resident of Village- Jasauli Tole Goha, P.O. Jasauli Pakari, P.S. Kathaiya, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Joint Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna through the Chairman, Veterinary College, Campus, Patna.

6. The Chairman, The Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna, Veterinary College, Campus, Patna.

7. The Secretary, The Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna, Veterinary College, Campus, Patna.

8. The State Disability Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the SSC : Mr. S.S. Sunda, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, AC to AAG 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 03-12-2018] It is submitted by counsel for the Staff Selection Commission that in view of certain developments which took place after the order being passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6914 of 2015 the issue is now being looked into by the Commission with respect to petitioner's exclusion in the process of selection for appointment as Assistant Teacher.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17668 of 2016 dt.03-12-2018 2/2 Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has submitted his objection and the process of examining the objection is still going on.

In view of such developments subsequent to filing of the writ petition, there is no scope for this Court to issue any direction.

Writ petition is disposed off.

Prakash/- (Madhuresh Prasad, J) AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date