Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3037/2015bail granted

Prem Chandra Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-23Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3037 of 2015 (4) dt.23-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3037 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2013 Thana -PAHARPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Prem Chandra Kumar Ram Son of Ganga Ram Resident of vill-Bhatoli Parasauni P.S-Pharpur,Distt.-East Champaran,Motihari .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 23-04-2015 Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of petitioner has been taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP.

As per allegation, Rs.3,90,920/- still remains with the petitioner.

By way of supplementary affidavit, petitioner placed Annexure-3, counter foil of deposit slip, whereupon learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Rs. 1,59,415/- has already been deposited after institution of the case, which also happens to be subject of verification by the learned lower court and, in case, is found correct, then in that event, on deposit of Rs.2,31,505/- petitioner, Prem Chandra Kumar Ram petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within eight weeks, is directed to be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3037 of 2015 (4) dt.23-04-2015 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Paharpur PS Case no. 133/2013, subject to the condition as enumerated under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. However, it is made clear that deposit of amount will not be treated as an admission at the end of petitioner, during course of trial.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) perwez U T