Pawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44380 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2026 Thana- GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR DistrictSiwan ====================================================== Pawan Kumar S/o Virendra Yadav R/o Viilage - Satwar, P.S.- G.B. Nagar, District - Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raghav Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The Investigating Officer of the case, in compliance of the order dated 21.07.2026 is present in the Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that he along with she along with her younger brother (Santosh) had come to meet their maternal grand father, when petitioner along with six named accused persons came and started abusing, on objection, Pawan assaulted her by knife causing injury on chest and right thigh, thereafter Rita assaulted by farsha causing injury on head, further Nikki along with named accused persons excluding Pawan and Rita assaulted Santosh and Dhananjay
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44380 of 2026(3) dt.23-07-2026 2/3 causing injury, further the informant on account of assault became unconscious and when she regained consciousness she found herself in Siwan Govt. Hospital, next alleges that her maternal grand father does not have a son, thus accused persons wanted to grab his property.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that mother of the petitioner and mother of the informant are own sisters. It is further submitted that the relationship of the informant with petitioner in the FIR has been concealed for ulterior reason. It is next submitted that though petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant by knife causing injury on chest and right thigh but then the allegation stands belied by the injury report annexed as Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application. It is submitted that the injury report records- injury caused by hard and blunt substance and does not record any injury on chest and thigh rather records lacerated wound on forehead. It is further submitted that since there is a dispute relating to property, as such the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case.
6. On query of the court from the I.O. of the case that as to what transpired during the course of investigation to connect the petitioner with the offence, it is fairly submitted that petitioner and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44380 of 2026(3) dt.23-07-2026 3/3 informant are related and no injury was found on chest and thigh of the informant.
7. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and also taking into considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with G.B. Nagar P.S. Case No.181 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.
9. The personal appearance of the Investigating Officer of the case is dispensed with.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T