Ram Laddu Rai v. State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.98 of 2004 dt.29-06-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 98 of 2004 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null DistrictSARAN ======================================================== Ram Laddu Rai, Son of Tokhi Rai, Resident of Village-Kanhauli Sangram, P.S.-Baniapur, District-Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ram Ekbal Rai, Son of Ram Sewak Rai.

3. Prabhu Rai, Son of Ram Sewak Rai.

4. Bhagwan Rai, Son of Ram Sewak Rai.

5. Harihar Rai, Son of Ram Sewak Rai.

6. Dharma Nath Rai, Son of Bishun Rai.

7. Dudhnath Rai, Son of Bishun Rai.

8. Acchey Lal Ahir, Son of Jamadar Ahir. All resident of Village-Harpur Dhakhin Tola, P.S.-Baniapur, Distt.-Saran.

9. Maharaja Ahir, Son of Lakhichand Ahir.

10. Awadh Ahir, Son of Lakhichand Ahir. Both Resident of Village-Pithori, P.S.-Baniapur, Distt.-Saran.

11. Agnideo Singh, Son of Damodar Singh, Resident of Village Bhumihara, P.S.-Baniapur, Distt.-Saran.

.... .... Respondent/s ======================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan 1, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Hari Shankar Roy, Adv. ======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 29-06-2015 The Petitioner seeks revision of the judgment of acquittal dated 20.11.2003 passed by the Ad hoc Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Saran at Chapra in S.Tr. No. 04 of 1989.

Having gone through the impugned judgment of acquittal, I do not find any perversity in the same and, hence, decline to interfere in the matter.

Hence, the Revision Application stands dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T