Ramanand Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8693 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Ramanand Singh Son of Sri Sudarshan Singh resident of village - Baikatpur, Police Station - Khusrupur in the district of Patna Presently Up - Sarpanch, Baikatpur Gram Kachahari, Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Home Secretary, Department of Home Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate - Cum - Collector, Patna

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Patna City, Patna

6. The Circle officer, Khusrupur in the district of Patna

7. Station House officer, Khusrupur, P.S. Patna

8. Ashok Kumar Son of Siyaram Sharma

9. Om Prakash Tiwary, Son of Shambhu Tiwary @ Sidheshwar Tiwary Both are resident of village + Post - Baikatpur, P.S. Khusrupur in the district of Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, GA-9 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT AND

ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) Date: 30-01-2016 Heard Mr. Raj Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned Government Advocate-9, appearing on behalf of the State. The grievance of the writ petitioner, made in this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature

Patna High Court CWJC No.8693 of 2015 dt.30-01-2016 2/2 of Public Interest Litigation, relates to encroachment of public path/public road.

Having regard to the facts pleaded in this writ petition, the materials on record and, having heard learned Counsel for both the parties, we find that the subject matter of this writ petition is fully covered by the observations made, and the directions given by us in the order, dated 24.11.2015, passed in C.W.J.C. No.4309 of 2015 (Sanjay Jha Vs. The State of Bihar and Others), reported in 2016

(1) PLJR 248.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that respondent No. , namely, shall act, in the present matter, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made and the directions given in the order, dated 24.11.2015, aforementioned.

In view of the above, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(I. A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U