Ajay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45861 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2026 Thana- SATHI District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Ajay Singh S/o Surendra Singh R/o Vill- Sathi, Ward no 8, P.S.- Sathi, Distt.- West Champaran 2.

Surendra Singh S/o Late Bachha Singh R/o Vill- Sathi, Ward no 8, P.S.- Sathi, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352, 76, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, on account of land dispute, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came at the house of informant and petitioner no. 2 assaulted on the head of informant with iron rod. These petitioners are also alleged to have assaulted wife of informant with iron rod and farsa as a result of which both of them sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45861 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on account of land dispute, altercation took place in which both sides sustained injuries. Injury sustained by the wife of informant is simple in nature. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Petitioners have got one criminal antecedent in which they are on bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application and submits that there is specific accusation of assault against petitioners and injury caused to the informant by petitioner no. 2 is found to be grievous.

6. In view of the fact that petitioner 2o. 2 caused grievous injury, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 2 is refused.

7. However, considering the nature of accusation and injury, the anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner no. 1 is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioner no. 1 in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sathi P. S. Case No. 93 of 2026, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45861 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026 3/3 condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T