Shobha Dipti @ Mamta Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28142 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -360 Year- 2014 Thana -ALAMGANJ District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Shobha Dipti @ Mamta Devi, aged about 36 years W/o Santosh Kumar R/o Sipara, Gandhi Chowk, P.S. Beur, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Informant : Smt. Rekha Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. J.K.Singh,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 28-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 360 of 2014.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner is married 'nanad' of the deceased living separately with her own family and as such not concerned with the day-to-day affairs of the informant's family. There is no specific accusation in the FIR with regard to demand of dowry and inflicting torture at the hands of the petitioner.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28142 of 2015 (2) dt.28-07-2015
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 360 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions: (i) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make herself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U T