Satish Yadav @ Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47825 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- PALANWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Satish Yadav @ Satish Kumar Son of Sambhu Prasad Yadav @ Shambhu Yadav Resident of Village - Gad Bahuari, P.S.- Palanwa, Dist.- East Champaran, Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari For the Informant :

Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Palanwa P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025 dated 09.03.2025 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 103(1) and 238 of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the coaccused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47825 of 2025(3) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.03.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and there is specific allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the deceased with bamboo due to which she died. It is further stated that as per para 26 of the case diary, he himself confessed that he committed murder of the deceased.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

7. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T