Vivek Prakash v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29779 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -651 Year- 2014 Thana -BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C DistrictBHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Vivek Prakash, Son of Om Prakash Chaturvedi, resident of village + Post Office - Fakarabad, Police Station - Kudra, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua ) .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .
2. Mandakini Prakash W/o Vivek Prakash, Daughter of Dr. Ram Prabha Ojha Presently is residing at N 1/2 B - 5, Gangotri Vihar, Nagawa, Post Office + Police Station - Lanka, District - Varanasi ( U.P. ) .... .... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2015 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 651 of 2014 for the offences instituted under Sections 498(A) of the I.P.C. and 3⁄4 of the D. P. Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The accusation is of demand of dowry and on nonfulfilment of the same torture was inflicted by the accused persons.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner and the complainant have expressed that they
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29779 of 2015 (2) dt.29-07-2015 2/2 are not in a position to stay together. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit an amount of Rs. 5000/- per month in the court below which may be released in favour of the complainant.
On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 5000/- per month in the court below which shall be released in favour of the complainant and on doing so, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 651 of 2014, corresponding to Trial no. 71 of 2015, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bhabua, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T