← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56889/2021bail granted

Sudhir Kumar Srivastava @ Sudhir Kumar Srivastav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-16Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56889 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2055 Year-2019 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== SUDHIR KUMAR SRIVASTAVA @ SUDHIR KUMAR SRIVASTAV Son of Harihar Prasad Resident of Village- Gopalpur, Adjacent to Dr. Swastak Sinha, P.S.- Motihari Town, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

AMINA SRIVASTAVA W/o Sudhir Kumar Srivastava, D/o Devanand Pd. Srivastava At Present R/o Village- Kumaria Tola, P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhurendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is husband of the victim. All the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56889 of 2021(2) dt.16-11-2021 2/2 offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Tr. No. 2541 of 2019 arising out of Complaint Case No. C-2055 of 2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T