Padmaja v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2023 ====================================================== Padmaja Wife of Rupesh Kumar, Resident of Village- Rasalpur, Ward no.6, P.S- Dumara, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary Department of Education Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director, ICDS, Deptt. of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Commissoner, Tirhut Division (Pramandal) Muzaffarpur Bihar. 5.
The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.
6.
The District Programme Officer, Sitamarhi.
7.
The Child Development Project Officer, Dumara Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate Mrs. Madhumala Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Madanjeet Kumar (GP-20) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this application is being filed for issuance of a writ preferably in the nature of Certiorari setting aside impugned order dated 15.05.2023 passed in ICDS Revision No.59/2021 by the Respondent No.4, the Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur whereby and whereunder the Revision Petition has been petition has been rejected on the ground that the present Revision is not
Patna High Court CWJC No.12370 of 2023(2) dt.19-02-2024 2/2 maintainable in the eye of law and as also directing the respondents concerned to appoint the petitioner as Anganwari Sevika on the basis of merit list which has been prepared by the Respondent Child Development Project Officer Dumara, Sitamarhi, And/Or any other relief or reliefs, for which petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of this case."
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U