Vivekanand Vikram @ Lalu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1276 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
RAMBRIKSH @ RAMVRIKSH SINGH SON OF LATE SITARAM MAHTO @ SITA RAM PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGEAZAMGARH, P.S-RAUSHANGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA 2.
ARUN PRASAD @ ARUN KUMAR VERMA @ ARUN KUMAR VERM SON OF RAMESHWAR PRASAD 3.
MAMTA DEVI @ MAMTA KUMARI @ ANUPAM KUMARI @ MAMTA KU. W/O ARUN PRASAD @ ARUN KUMAR VERMA @ ARUN KUMAR VERM PETITIONER NO. 2 AND 3 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMEGHATHAN, P.S.-KOTHI, DISTRICT-GAYA. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
KEDAR PRASAD S/O LATE BHOLA PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SHAILWAN, P.S. MADANPUR, TOLA-KOERIBIGHA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 917 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== VIVEKANAND VIKRAM @ LALU Son of Yugesh Prasad Resident of Village- Vijua Barwadih, P.S.- Dumariya (Now Bhadwar), Distt- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
KEDAR PRASAD Son of Late Bhola Prasad Resident of Village- Shailwan, P.S.- Madanpur, Tola- Koeribigha, Distt- Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 1276 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 917 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1276 of 2021(5) dt.27-01-2022 2/2 27-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State video conferencing. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 241/2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/504/406 of the Indian Penal Code.
Despite service of notice, opposite party No. 2 has chosen not to appear.
Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed. Accordingly, let the petitioners above named be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of ten weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Complaint Case No. 241/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/-Anand Kr.
U T