Sonu Kumar @ Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45453 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-764 Year-2024 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Sonu Kumar @ Raja Kumar, Son of Satnarayan Yadav, Resident of Village - Hakpad Sukhasan, Ward No.- 6, P.O.- Aran, P.S.- Saharsa Sadar, District - Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Piyush Saurav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. B.N. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-09-2025 Heard Mr. Piyush Saurav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.N. Pandey, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 764 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that from the house of this petitioner, three country made pistols, one revolver and six live cartridges were recovered.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has further been submitted that on the same day two F.I.Rs. were lodged against the petitioner. One was under Section 30 (a) of Bihar Prohibition
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45453 of 2025(3) dt.11-09-2025 2/2 and Excise Amendment Act and second was this case. He is in judicial custody since 29.01.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the state has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the recovery of the arms from the possession of this petitioner, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
7. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months, if the trial is not concluded. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T