Nitu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5747 of 2013 ====================================================== Nitu Kumari W/O Sri Ajay Kumar Purvey R/O Village- Khabdah Dumaria, P.O.- Kanhaili, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Education Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. District Magistrate, Araria

3. Member, District Teacher Appellate Tribunal, Araria

4. Block Development Officer, Narpatganj, Araria

5. Shanti Gupta W/O Ishwar Chandra Sah And D/O Bhola Prasad Sah Panchayat Teacher, Gram Panchayat- Rewahi, P.O.- Narpatganj, District- Araria, At Present Resident Near Mahila Training College, Ward No. 19, Farbishganj, Araria .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.K. Saraf, AC to GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had applied for the post of Panchayat Teacher in Gram Panchayat Rewahi against the vacancy published with reference to second phase. The petitioner was not selected and in her place, one Shanti Gupta (Respondent No.5) has wrongly been appointed as a Panchayat Teacher.

Being aggrieved by the action of the respondents, the petitioner approached to the District Teacher Employment

Patna High Court CWJC No.5747 of 2013 (3) dt.25-02-2016 Appellate Tribunal but, the Tribunal has not done any thing and the matter is still pending. Accordingly, a prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the application, which is pending before the appellate tribunal, be directed to be adjudicated.

Considering the prayer of the petitioner, the Tribunal is directed to pass a reasoned order after giving notice to the parties within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U