← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43526/2019bail granted

Pappu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-18Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43526 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2018 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== PAPPU SHARMA Son of Murari Sharma @ Murari Singh Resident of Village - Tengra, P.S.- Barun, Distt - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Barun P.S. Case No. 193 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 379 and 356 of Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that occurrence is alleged to have taken place on 25.5.2018 and First Information Report has been lodged on 8.10.2018 after lapse of 3 1⁄2 years. Petitioner was in Jail custody in Madanpur P.S. Case No. 218 of 2017. Therefore, the allegation made by the informant in the written report and his re-statement that petitioner promised to return the articles allegedly snatched by him is totally incorrect.

It is alleged in the written report that on 25/5/2018

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43526 of 2019(2) dt.18-07-2019 2/2 when son of the informant was going to Anugrah Narayan Road Railway Station to receive him from Station, near the turning at rice mill before Pritampur, Pappu Sharma stopped him, threatened and assaulted. He also snatched his Motorcycle. From the impugned order it appears that petitioner has been remanded in the case from Madanpur P.S. Case No. 218 of 2017. He is in custody since 16.4.2019. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no recovery from possession of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 193 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be close relatives of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T